Legal Opinion

Castrillon v. Oulabed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Juan Carlos Castrillon (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs’ submissions either did not constitute competent medical evidence in admissible form (see Grasso v Angerami, 79 NY2d 813, 814-815 [1991]; Pagano v Kingsbury, 182…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Pagano v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Deutsch v. TenempaguayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API