Thompson v. Cain
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
This action was originally brought by John Thompson in his lifetime and revived before trial by his administratrix who is his widow. There is an irreconcilable conflict in the testimony as to substantially every material fact. Briefly stated, it is the claim of plaintiff that she and her husband each invested $3,000 in lots of the Calcasieu Sulphur & Oil company and stock of the Calcasieu Drilling Company whose properties were located in Louisiana, neither ,of which companies had complied with the provisions j of Act No. 46, Pub. Acts 1915 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 11945 et seq.), commonly called…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Joslin v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Drees v. Minnesota Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Chambers v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Freeze v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Brown v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.