Legal Opinion

Arthur Gilchrist v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1970No. 29456_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing.

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the petition of a federal convict for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

In his habeas corpus petition in the court below appellant contended (1) that he has been deprived of 113 days of his accumulated good time without just cause, and (2) that he has been placed in double…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lloyd Mullican and Kenneth Eugene Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Earl X. Smoake v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Edward Joseph Keaveny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Frank L. Rush v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. Tony Silva Cordova, Raymond Velarde Duran and Anthony Moreno JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Kenneth Alexander Hutchison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Jusse J. StuckeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Turner v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API