Legal Opinion
W. B. Roddenberg Co. v. Kalich
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 9, 1946No. 5225PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The appellant, W. B. Roddenbery Co. (hereinafter referred to as Roddenbery), has appealed here from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 65 USPQ 254, overruling that of the Examiner of Trade-mark Interference which sustained Roddenbery’s notice of opposition to appellee Kalich’s application for the registration of the notation “Big Patch” as a trade-mark which, as applied for, was for fresh vegetables. The notice of opposition was based upon Rodden-bery’s use of its registered trade-marks, “Cane Patch” for cane syrup, “Pickle Patch” as applied to pickles and pickle relish, and “Patch”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- California Packing Corp. v. Price-Booker Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- White House Milk Products Co. v. Dwinell-Wright Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- California Prune & Apricot Growers Ass'n v. Dobry Flour Mills, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- William S. Merrell Co. v. Anacin Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- General Foods Corp. v. Casein Co. of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cbs Inc. v. George Clifford MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Interstate Brands Corp. v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Coty, Inc. v. Perfumes Habana, S. A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Company v. General Aluminum Window Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.