Legal Opinion

Bogner v. State Dept. of Revenue and Tax.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 15300Published

1Opinion of the Court

693 P.2d 1056 (1984)

107 Idaho 854

Rosmarie BOGNER, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

STATE of Idaho DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND TAXATION, STATE TAX COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15300.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

December 31, 1984.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., William A. Von Tagen, argued, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Boise, for defendant-appellant.

Douglas James Aanestad, of Hogue, Speck, & Aanestad, Ketchum, for plaintiff-respondent.

BISTLINE, Justice.

HISTORY

The plaintiff-respondent, Rosmarie Bogner, is a West German citizen and has been a resident of Idaho since 1981. Her principal source of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. LenckosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Bogner v. State Dept. of Revenue and Tax.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API