Legal Opinion

Fisk v. Town of Redding

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 21, 2019No. AC40216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

The plaintiff, Gregg Fisk, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendant town of Redding. 1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in (1) denying his motion to set aside the verdict and (2) excluding evidence of subsequent remedial measures. We agree with the plaintiff's first claim but disagree with the second.

The record reveals the following facts. A retaining wall was constructed as part of the defendant's "Streetscape Project." The project was funded by federal and state grants, and the state Department of Transportation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. State v. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-StrattonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Quinnett v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Warren v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisk v. ReddingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. Fisk v. Town of ReddingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. Vargas v. Kang Sjuen, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API