Legal Opinion
BALAO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1992No. ID 3167PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3167 MATTER OF BALAO In Deportation Proceedings A-19679883 Decided by Board March 26, 1992 Intent to defraud is not an essential element of the crime of passing bad checks under title 18, section 4105(a)(1) of - the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes and, therefore, a conviction under this law is not for a crime involving moral turpitude. CHARGE: Orden Act of 1952—Sec. 241(a)(4) [ 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(4)J—Crimes involving moral turpitude Lodged; Act of 1952—Sec. 241(a)(1)(C) [ 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(1)(C)—Nonimmigrant- failed to comply with conditions of status ON BEHALF OF…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- United States Ex Rel. Parco v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- SANCHEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MutnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kykhosro Notash v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- PEREZ-CONTRERASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
- Sammir A. Poveda v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Mendez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Mendez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.