Legal Opinion

Harter v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Claim for damages caused by the flooding of claimant’s land.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

In connection with its canal system the state maintains a dam, known as the Gaynor dam, across Limestone creek, in the town of Manlius, Onondaga county. A canal feeder leads from a point on the creek just above the dam to the Erie canal, at a point near an aqueduct. Limestone creek flows from the dam parallel with the feeder, and a few feet distant from and below the latter, to the canal and under the aqueduct. About one-fourth of a mile along the feeder from the intake, and about half a mile up the feeder from the aqueduct, is a waste weir in the feeder bank nearest to the creek. The creek,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carhart v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Ostrander v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Cooper v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bauer v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1919
  2. Ripton v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1921
  3. Montezuma Garden Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API