Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Schimberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 20, 1911No. Gen. No. 15,963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill for specific performance. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1909. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The bill in this case was filed to enforce the specific performance of an agreement alleged to have been made between David Cohen, complainant, and William Schimberg, defendant. The agreement alleged in the bill is that William Schimberg agreed to furnish Cohen with a complete stock of wines, liquors and cigars and a set of saloon fixtures to be used by Cohen in conducting a retail saloon business; that out of the receipts of said business Cohen agreed to pay for the same in periodical installments until the indebtedness so created had been fully satisfied.

It is also alleged in the bill that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennis v. HiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Marine Trust Co. v. ReynoldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API