Legal Opinion
Hirmiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 7, 2017No. 06-371Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 06-371V (Filed: November 22, 2017 ) (Reissued: December 7, 2017) ) FRANCIA HIRMIZ and PETER HIRMIZ, ) Vaccine case; attorneys’ fees and as best friends of their daughter, J.H., ) costs; reasonable basis for appeal ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) John F. McHugh, Law Office of John McHugh, New York, NY for petitioners. Ryan D. Pyles, Trial Attorney, Torts Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. With him on the brief was Chad A. Readler,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Perreira v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.