Spurlock v. Port Townsend Southern Railroad
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.— Hon. M. J. Gordon, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*30The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, 0. J.
This action was brought to recover damages caused by fires alleged to have been occasioned to the property of the plaintiff by the negligence of the defendant in the operation of its railroad. It rer suited in a judgment against:the defendant, to reverse which this appeal has been prosecuted.
Three reasons are assigned why the judgment, should be reversed: (1) The overruling of the objection of the defendant to the introduction of parol proof as to the title tp the land upon which the property was situated; (2) the admission of¡ testimony by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McNarra v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Parke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lownsdale v. Gray's Harbor Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McPhillameyWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- Montesano Lum. & Mfg. Co. v. Portland Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Henry v. Navy Yard RouteWashington Supreme Court · 1917