Legal Opinion
Territory of Alaska v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided June 20, 1947No. 5351-APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The question presented in this controversy is whether the defendant is subject to the provisions of section 3138, C.L.A. 1933 that:
“Any person, firm or corporation, prosecuting or attempting to prosecute any of the following lines of business, or who shall employ any of the following appliances, in the Territory of Alaska, shall apply for and obtain, a license and pay for such license, for the respective lines of business and appliances, as follows — * * *
“13. Mercantile establishments, other than exclusively wholesale mercantile establishments, doing business of more…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Freeman v. HewitSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- K & L Distributors, Inc. v. State of AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1960