Prine v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
Appellant was convicted as accessory to murder; punishment is two years.
At the outset appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending no offense is shown, and further, that the testimony of the accomplice witness Timothy Don Littrell is not corroborated.
Article 77, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., provides in part:
“An accessory is one who, knowing that an offense has been committed, conceals the offender, or gives him any other aid in order that he may evade an arrest or trial or the execution of his sentence.”
It is clear from the record that Littrell committed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Littles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Gottschalk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- McGoodwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Easter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Wintters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.