Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Coryell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The case sufficiently appears from the following opinion, furnished by the Chancellor, as containing his reasons for the decree appealed from.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill was filed, on behalf of an Infant complainant, to compel the defendants, as executors of the will of John Holcomb, deceased, and as trus*290tees under that will, to account for the estate of the testator that had come to their hands, and for the execution of their trust. The defendants answered the bill. The cause has progressed to the taking of the account before the master, and a decision of the court upon exceptions taken by the defendants to the master’s report. On behalf of the complainant, a motion is now made to change the trustees, appoint a receiver, or to compel…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McAllister v. McAllisterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  2. Taylor v. ErrionNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Caldwell National Bank v. RickardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. In Re RyanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API