Legal Opinion

Hitch v. Hitch

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 12, 1970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Justice.

This is a complaint brought in the Superior Court by the plaintiff in her capacity of executrix of the last will and testament of Hazael Arnold Foster Linseott, late of Bar Harbor, Maine, to secure a judicial construction of her testatrix’s will under 14 M.R.S.A., § 6051(10). The record shows that the only persons joined as parties defendants in the action were the plaintiff in her individual capacity and the Attorney General of the State of Maine. The action is before us on report under Rule 72(b), M.R.C.P., upon the complaint, exhibits, and agreed statement of facts, for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tapley v. DouglassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  2. Burgess v. ShepherdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  3. Webb v. DowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  4. Fenn v. FennSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  5. Inhabitants of Lebanon v. ShapleighSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SrpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Desmond v. PersinaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. In Re Estate of CassidySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Lindsey v. County of CumberlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  5. Canal National Bank v. Old Folks' Home Ass'n of BrunswickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API