Legal Opinion
The Queen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 1889PublishedCited by 15 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The petitioners, of whom five were seamen, and two others government inspectors on the dredge Queen, applied to the court after an interlocutory decree holding the City of Alexandria and the Queen both in fault for the collision between them, (31 Fed. Rep. 427,) to be made co-libelants, in order to recover for their loss of personal effects and for personal injuries. No sufficient reason to the contrary appearing, the application was granted.
1. Personal Effects. Two of the petitioners have given no evidence as to their claims. The others I find lost personal effects of the values following,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The " Alabama " & the " Game-Cock."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- The AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- The EleanoraU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
3Cited by15 opinions
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Simone v. the Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907
- Olson v. Oregon Coal & Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- Stahl v. The NiagaraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1896
- Keating v. Pacific Steam Whaling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.