Legal Opinion · Dissent

88-09 Realty L.L.C. v. Hill

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 9, 2001Published

1DissentPatterson, J.

RPAPL 711 (5) provides that a summary proceeding may be maintained where “[t]he premises, or any part thereof, are used or occupied * * * for any illegal trade or manufacture, or other illegal business.” This court has held that “[i]n order to demonstrate ‘use’ of the premises for il*289legal purposes * * * a tenant must have knowledge of and acquiesce to the use of the demised premises for such an illegal activity” (Clifton Ct. v Williams, NYLJ, May 27, 1998, at 28, col 6 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]). Because of the severity of the penalty — a forfeiture of the leasehold — this court has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. 220 West 42 Associates v. CohenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1969
  2. Brown v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Syracuse Housing Authority v. BouleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. City of New York v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Willock v. Schenectady Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API