Legal Opinion

Fredericks v. Magee

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 17, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The question requiring decision is whether respondent is lawfully justified in refusing to return relator’s license to operate an automobile.

The pleadings and stipulations disclose that, on August 5th, 1935, relator was apprehended by the police of the city of Perth Amboy, and that on August 6th, 1935, he was tried and convicted by the acting recorder of that city on a charge of violating section 14, subdivision 3 of the Motor Vehicle act (chapter 208, Pamph. L. 1921), amended by chapter 171, Pamph. L. 1931 (operating a motor vehicle while…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dorman v. Usbe Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Westfield Trust Co. v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Wardell v. WarshofskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. ParsekianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Howe v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. State v. MooreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Goulter v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Kocses v. MageeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API