SANDERSVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. United States
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTLE, Senior District Judge:
This cause came on for trial before the Court without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the Court invited counsel to prepare proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Counsel have complied and the Court has carefully considered the proposals made. Having those proposals in mind and based upon all the evidence of record, both testimonial and documentary, including stipulations of counsel, the Court now makes its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as- follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. Background
1
This is a civil' action instituted by Sandersville…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Donruss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- F. E. Watkins Motor Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Crawford County Printing & Pub. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Sterling Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.