Milgram Thomajan & Lee, P.C. v. Golden Gate Petroleum, P.C.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment, entered September 26, 2012, affirmed, with $25 costs.

The action arises out of plaintiffs representation of the first-named defendant, a petroleum importer, in connection with an administrative protest of a customs duty assessment imposed on a shipment of gasoline and related chemicals. The jury’s verdict, finding that plaintiff did not commit malpractice in its underlying representation of defendant, was not against the weight of the evidence. The trial evidence, fairly interpreted, supports the jury’s evident rejection of defendant’s contention that but for…