Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 25, 1961No. Civ. A. Nos. 60-388-J, 60-386-JPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIAN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, Max Miller and Ruth Miller, husband and wife, bring suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b), to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle by an employee of the defendant.

Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, claiming to be the assignee of Ruth Miller and also to be subrogated to her rights, brings its action under the same Act to recover for the damage done to her automobile.

The United States counterclaims against Max Miller for the damage…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Guy v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Fire Insurance v. Daniel J. Keating Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Urban v. Zurich American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API