Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Arkin v. Old Republic Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 1979No. Nos. 78-211, 78-212Published

1ConcurrenceKehoe, Judge

I concur with the decision of the majority in this case, except I would affirm based upon the authority of the following cases as they relate to the question of coverage under insurance policies which contain identical and mutually repugnant excess insurance clauses. I note that this is not a ease involving the question of indemnity. See Rouse v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 506 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1975) (construing Florida law); Consolidated Systems, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 411 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1969) (construing Florida law); Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Atlantic National Insurance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1958
  2. Motor Vehicle Casualty Company v. Atlantic National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. HARTFORD ACC. & IND. CO. INC. v. Liberty M. Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Rouse v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Consolidated Systems, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API