Legal Opinion

McCord v. Briggs & Turivas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 25, 1928No. Gen. No. 32,492PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

At the June term, on the 28th day of the month, there was pending in the circuit court of Cook county an appeal of the defendant, Briggs & Turivas, a corporation, from a judgment entered by a police magistrate in an action in forcible entry and detainer. James It. McCord, appellant here, was the plaintiff in that action. The record shows that on that day the following order was entered by Judge Caverly:

“This cause being called for trial and the defendant failing to prosecute the appeal herein, on motion of plaintiff’s attorney it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cook v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Cramer v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Chapman v. North American Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Mitchell v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Marabia v. Mary Thompson Hospital of Chicago for Women & ChildrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Resto v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API