Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Berry

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 21, 1948No. 3756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The petition for habeas corpus must be denied, and in so deciding we are treating the matter as though the petition were properly amended by adding an application for a writ of certiorari. Kruzas v. O’Dowd, 83 N. H. 173. Since calling for the mittimus was an administrative rather than a judicial function (Couture v. Brown, 82 N. H. 459) neither reason nor authority appear to prevent the Municipal Court from entrusting the performance of this act to the city marshall who was by virtue of statute a constable and conservator of the peace. R. L., c. 65, s. 9. But as was said in the Couture case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Trainor v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. In re ThayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  3. In re RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DearoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. State v. CallaghanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. In Re DearoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API