Legal Opinion

In re Holman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for permission to proceed as poor person and for assignment of counsel denied. Memorandum: The appeal of petitioner lacks merit, and, therefore, his motion for permission to proceed as a poor person is denied. Granting a name change to petitioner, who is a convicted felon presently serving a sentence of imprisonment, would create record-keeping problems for the New York State Department of Correctional Services and other State and Federal agencies required to maintain criminal records (see, e.g., United States v Duke, 458 F Supp 1188; cf., Matter of Washington, 216 AD2d 781).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. United States v. DukeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re FurickNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Matter of D.A.New York Supreme Court, Putnam County · 2024
  3. Matter of D.A.New York Supreme Court, Putnam County · 2024
  4. GLANOWSKI, ROBERT, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. In re GlanowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API