Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1941No. O-3067Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable W. A. 'Bill" Bundy, Ohaimmn B1oemosyI3Arynlvertigrtlngcoaittee House of Reprseezatstivea Austin, Texas Desr Sir: letter of Awrt S, 6 depaeaiult touahing roaepted the *ViWd civil at8tUtW Of %XW, pl’OVid.0 lleotion OF appointmentby the Bow3 of' t of l Sta te horpitalr 8haJ.lelmt a mperintmndont the olaas of perron oonmltted to his ahmge. The term of offioo -11 be two pare, subject to removal 8~ the Board for Rood eauar)." Honorable1. A. "Bill" Bundy, Page 2 In Kno%, et al v. Johnmon, 141 9. Y. (2d) 698, vrit rmfumad, It warnheld that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Rose v. HimelySupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  3. State ex rel. Coogan v. BarbourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  4. State Ex Rel. Scofield v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  5. Allen v. MortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API