Legal Opinion

Mashkes v. Jakenjo, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 20, 2001No. [No. 20, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Chancellor sustained a demurrer to a bill for enforcement of a mechanic’s lien because he found that the notice to claim the lien was insufficient in failing to set forth a sufficient description of the nature and kind of the materials furnished and the time when they were furnished.

The contract was an indivisible one for all the electrical work in a building, according to plans and specifications, for an agreed price.

The notice advised the owner that it was intended to claim a lien on 7856 Eastern Avenue (describing the property by metes and bounds and giving the deed reference) for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Treusch v. ShryockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Parkway Estates, Inc. v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Himelfarb v. B & M Welding & Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Palmer Park Ltd. Partnership v. Marvelite, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. G. Edgar Harr Sons v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API