Legal Opinion

McMahon v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1950No. 19 of 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

In this Admiralty action, two causes of action are asserted, one for damages and the other for maintenance and cure. In the cause of action for damages, two accidents are involved; one in November 1945 and the other in December 1945. The libel, was filed January 22, 1948, more than two years after the occurrence of the events alleged as the basis for the causes of action set forth in the libel. Respondent has moved to dismiss the libel as to both causes of action on the ground that the libel was not timely filed under the provisions of the Suits in Admiralty Act of March…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rodinciuc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Thurston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Kruhmin v. United States War Shipping AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Christo v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Ran v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McMahon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Desmond v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API