Legal Opinion

Hill v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided May 24, 1991No. 89-91PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

MANKIN, Associate Judge:

Hazel Hill here appeals an October 5, 1989, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision which denied as untimely her application for benefits under the Restored Entitlement Program for Survivors (REPS), Pub.L. No. 97-377, Title I, § 156, 96 Stat. 1920 (1982) (codified as 42 U.S.C. § 402 note (1988), [benefits]). The Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 4052(a) (1988).

Appellant complains on appeal that she was not provided with notice of eligibility for REPS benefits. The Secretary published regulations implementing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  4. Younger v. TurnageDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyman v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API