Contorno v. Ensley Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
This * action^ by appellee against appellant was commenced in the inferior court of Ensley, was taken by defendant to the circuit court, and is now here on his appeal.
The contention first to be noticed is that the complaint, filed in the inferior court, and upon which, without improvement, judgment by default was rendered in the circuit court, stated no cause o>f action. The complaint is extraordinarily bad. It fails to specify the legal character of plaintiff, though the name in which it sues suggests a corporation. It names defendant by approximation only. Its single count passes without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Littleton v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Simmons v. Titche Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Barron v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Arundale v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cobb & Woodham v. W. E. Duggan Lumber Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1932