Legal Opinion

Houston v. Perry

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1849PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Travis.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

At the trial of this cause a jury was waived; and in the opinion of the court it was considered that the following facts were established, viz:

1st. That Austin and Williams entered into the contract with the State of Coahuila and Texas, as set forth in their petition and amended petition.

2d. That Robert Peebles was duly appointed and qualified as commissioner lor the colony in September, 1835, and that before the closing of the laud •offices on the 13th of November, 1835, lie had extended titles to fifty-two married men, three widows, and twenty-four single men, and that he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spencer v. LapsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Dabney v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Burleson v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Nease v. Broadwater Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Dabney v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API