Legal Opinion

People v. Glasgow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to suppress physical evidence seized from defendant at the time of his arrest. The arresting officer had reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed the offense of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26) in his presence and was thus entitled to arrest defendant without a warrant (see, CPL 140.10 [1] [a]; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223). The search of defendant was authorized as a search incident to that lawful arrest (see, People v Barclay, 201 AD2d 952).

The court did not abuse its.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. BarclayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. RudenkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API