Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1975No. Crim. 17625PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Defendant appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of grand theft (auto). (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 3.) Defendant’s mid-trial motion to suppress evidence as being the product of an illegal search was denied on the ground his failure to have made the motion prior to trial was inexcusable. Defendant contends the untimeliness of the motion should , have been excused, alleging he was previously unaware of the grounds for suppression. Defendant alternatively concedes the suppression motion was untimely but contends he was thereby denied effective assistance of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. StanworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. StricklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. State v. McNicolUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. MylesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API