Legal Opinion

Stadelman v. Miner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1918No. 644PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OREGON. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

The statutes of Oregon provide, that when it becomes necessary to sell real estate of a decedent in order to pay his debts (Lord’s Oregon Laws, §§ 1252-1270), the admin istrator shall file a petition therefor; and that a citation shall issue to heirs known and unknown “to appear at a term of court therein mentioned, not less than ten days after the service of such citation, to show cause, if any exist, why an order of sale should not be made as in the petition prayed for.” § 1254. The statutes also provide for the service of unknown or non-resident heirs by publication for “not less than four…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Zucht v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SolumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Duane v. Merchants Legal Stamp Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API