Legal Opinion

Jones v. Alliance Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1896No. Appeal, No. 138PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 138, Jan. T., 1895, by L. H. Kinney, from order of C. P. Berks Co., Equity Docket 1891, No. 545, dismissing exceptions to master’s report. Bill in equity alleging insolvency of defendant and praying for the appointment of a receiver.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 138, Jan. T., 1895, by L. H. Kinney, from order of C. P. Berks Co., Equity Docket 1891, No. 545, dismissing exceptions to master’s report. Bill in equity alleging insolvency of defendant and praying for the appointment of a receiver. Exceptions to report of master appointed to distribute the estate of the defendant The master, William Young, Esq., reported the facts to be as follows: On November 28,1889, The Alliance Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Reading, Pa., issued to L. H. Kinney a policy of insurance in the amount of $1,000; $750 on his machinery, shafting, belting, etc.,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The appellant admitted when on the witness stand that he had received notice of the assessment made in January, 1891, a day or two after it was mailed to him. ■ As <a matter of fact he never paid the assessment and the evidence that he never intended to pay it, but that he intended to abandon the policy, was simply overwhelming. He took out other insurance for the very purpose of supplying the place of this policy. The master’s finding on this subject is eminently correct and could not have been otherwise under the testimony. It was confirmed by the learned court below and is…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Villars v. FaivreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  2. Scott v. Southwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API