Legal Opinion

McGlynn v. Town of Woodbury

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 14, 1987No. 85-184PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J. (Ret.),

Specially Assigned. The Town of Woodbury appeals an order of the superior court declaring that plaintiff’s request for a variance be deemed granted by operation of law. We reverse.

We are concerned here solely with the procedural history of the case. In July, 1984, the Administrative Officer for the Town of Woodbury denied plaintiffs’ application for a zoning permit. Plaintiffs subsequently appealed to the Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) seeking a variance or, in the alternative, a determination that their property was a pre-existing small lot and thus exempt from set-back…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Galanes v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  2. City of Rutland v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Harvey v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Vermont Division of State Buildings v. Town of Castleton Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Punderson v. Town of ChittendenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Levy v. Town of St. Albans Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Town of Charlotte v. RichmondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Vermont Criminal Justice Training CouncilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. In Re Appeal of AshlineSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API