Legal Opinion

Hale v. B., C. R. & N. R. Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCrary, C. J.

The complainants bring this suit for the purpose of establishing and enforcing a mechanic’s lien against the lines of railway now run and operated by the defendant, the Burlington, Cedar Eapids & Northern Eailway Company, the main line extending from Burlington, Iowa, to Postville, Iowa; the Pacific division extending from Vinton to Traer; the Muscatine division extending from Muscatine to Eiverside; and the Milwaukee extension from Linn to Postville. A lien is also claimed upon the rolling stock of said road, upon the right of way, road-bed, station-houses, car and engine-houses,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neilson, Benton & O'Donnel v. Iowa Eastern R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Gilcrest v. GottschalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Mervin v. ShermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  4. Bonsall v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perfection Tire & Rubber Co. v. Kellogg-Mackay Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API