Trustees of the Wabash & Erie Canal v. Brett
Indiana Supreme Court
AJPPEAL from the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, C. J.
This was an action by the appellees against the appellants.
The complaint was in -two paragraphs, not essentially different, so far as the question presented for our decision is concerned. It is alleged, and appears by a copy of the instrument made part of the complaint, that the defendants, in 1855, leased to the plaintiffs and one Spink, an acre of land in Daviess county, and “ the use and occupation of so much of the surplus water of the Wabash and Erie canal, at the first lock above Maysville, in said county, not required for navigation,” as might be necessary to propel a mill of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kellenberger v. ForesmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Morse v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fox v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bryan v. Louisville & N. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Biddle v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Hoagland v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Fishback v. WoodruffIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.