Legal Opinion

Carlesi v. P&G Bowling Corp.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 10, 1995No. CA9300210Published

1Opinion of the CourtCarey, J.

Defendant P&G Corp. (“P&G”) seeks a separate trial in this case, pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. *34042(b), on the issue of its liability, if any, and potential damages for the harm suffered by plaintiff Anthony J. Carlesi (“Carlesi”) when plaintiff was sexually molested by co-defendant Todd Machado (“Machado”). For the reasons stated below, I allow P&G’s motion and order separate trials for the defendants in this case.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Carlesi filed this action against P&G on February 1, 1993, alleging that P&G breached its duty to safely and properly maintain its property, Bowlers’ Country Club, so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dobos v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Roddy & McNulty Insurance Agency, Inc. v. A. A. Proctor & Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Cambridge Trust Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API