Legal Opinion

Hohlstein v. White

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1968No. 43279PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

Code Ann. § 81A-137 (d) provides: “If . . . a party wilfully fails to appear before the officer who is to take his deposition, after being served with a proper notice, . . . the court on motion and notice may strike out all or any part of any pleading of that party, or dismiss the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or enter a judgment by default against that party.” The rule is identical in wording with its federal equivalent, of which it has been said: “We call attention to the fact that the particular rule under which Far West moved for the dismissals, Fed. R. Civ. P.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Frank v. KempczynskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. MullinaxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Howard v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Leniston v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Howard v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API