Legal Opinion

State v. Laymon

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2004No. 28641PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

Lon 0. Laymon appeals from the district court’s order affirming his judgment of conviction for petit theft in the magistrate’s division. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Laymon was charged with the crime of petit theft in violation of Idaho Code §§ 18-2403 and 18-2407(2). The jury panel summoned for Laymon’s trial had previously been summoned the week before to potentially sit on a trial involving Laymon’s alleged possession of drug paraphernalia. After the jury had been selected in that case, but before commencement of the trial, the drug paraphernalia possession…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. David Leon JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. Brian Neil PrattIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. David Leon JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Dennis R. HeilmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API