Stafford National Bank v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Assumpsit against tlie defendants as partners under the name of The South Wilbraham Woolen Company; brought to the Superior Court in Tolland County. The facts were found by a committee, and judgment rendered for the defendants, (Martin, J.) Motions for a new trial and in error by the plaintiffs. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
The only question in this case is whether, under the facts found, George S. Moulton, one of the defendants, is liable in the suit.
The plaintiffs, in their first count, charge the defendant Moulton as a partner with certain other parties under the name of “The South Wilbraham Woolen Company,” and allege that the defendants by their firm name executed the draft in suit, which was for $5,000, drawn upon W. W. Huntington & Co., of the city of New York, and payable to the order of the defendants by their firm name, and by them endorsed in the same name to the plaintiffs. The common counts are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blanchard v. KaullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gibbs's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Kleckner v. TurkNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- John V. Farwell Co. v. Jackson StoresSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Bergeron v. HobbsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Rutherford v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.