Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 17, 1963No. Civ. No. 63-55PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

Plaintiff was employed by the defendant in the State of Oregon, and while so employed, claims that he was injured as a result of defendant’s negligence, for which injuries he demands a substantial amount.

Defendant challenges the right of plaintiff to prosecute this action, either at common law or under the statutory law of the State of Oregon, by reason of plaintiff executing, as part of his contract of employment, an agreement1 which limited his right, in case of injury, to that compensation which was afforded to workmen under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Johnson v. Philadelphia & Reading R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. West v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Alexander v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Blessing v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McAffee v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API