Legal Opinion

Atkins v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 18, 1977No. 41-76; No. 132-76; No. 357-76Published

1ConcurrenceNichols, Judge

I agree with and join the majority of the court in holding that the plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment and the petitions must be dismissed. But I depart so widely in my reasons as to Count I that I think it better to set them forth separately. This I will do in summary form, since no one is joining me in this statement and nothing I say will be "the law.” I divide what follows into two parts, I Jurisdiction, and II Merits, Count I. As to Count II, I join in the court’s per curiam opinion.

I. Jurisdiction

There are two jurisdictional barriers the plaintiffs must surmount. The first is…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API