Atkins v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1ConcurrenceNichols, Judge
I agree with and join the majority of the court in holding that the plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment and the petitions must be dismissed. But I depart so widely in my reasons as to Count I that I think it better to set them forth separately. This I will do in summary form, since no one is joining me in this statement and nothing I say will be "the law.” I divide what follows into two parts, I Jurisdiction, and II Merits, Count I. As to Count II, I join in the court’s per curiam opinion.
I. Jurisdiction
There are two jurisdictional barriers the plaintiffs must surmount. The first is…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.