Legal Opinion

Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Sup China, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 4, 2024No. 1:23-cv-10312Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MINDEN PICTURES, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 23 Civ. 10312 (DEH) (SLC) v. SUP CHINA, INC., REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendant. SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. TO THE HONORABLE DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc. (“Minden”) alleges that Defendant Sup China, Inc. (“SCI”) infringed its copyrighted photograph by unlawfully reproducing, distributing, and displaying it on SCI’s for-profit company website without authorization. (ECF No. 1 (the “Complaint”)). After SCI failed to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Enron Oil Corp. v. DiakuharaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 2 v. Moulton Masonry & Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API