Legal Opinion
Timmons v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided November 18, 1996No. Civil Action CV296-132Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this diversity of citizenship action against Defendant, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), for the deaths of four passengers who were killed while riding in a vehicle that was manufactured by Ford. Plaintiffs base their action upon the products liability laws of the state of Georgia. 1 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the automobile driver who was implead-ed by Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(a). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion will be GRANTED.
FACTS
This case involves the deaths of four…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grady Michael Higginbotham, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross John Henry Lee and Veronica P. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Mitchell v. GilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Faser v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Polston v. Boomershine Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Polston v. Boomershine Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.