Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided July 11, 2017No. Docket Nos. 17198-13, 17210-13Published

Ps own C, an S corporation that operates a landfill and uses the cash method of accounting for tax purposes. C is legally required to pay reclamation and closing costs if and when it closes the landfill. C currently deducted its estimated clean-up costs under I.R.C. section 468. R contends that I.R.C. section 468 applies only to accrual-method taxpayers.

Read the full summary

Ps own C, an S corporation that operates a landfill and uses the cash method of accounting for tax purposes. C is legally required to pay reclamation and closing costs if and when it closes the landfill. C currently deducted its estimated clean-up costs under I.R.C. section 468. R contends that I.R.C. section 468 applies only to accrual-method taxpayers. Held: The term "taxpayer" in I.R.C. section 468 includes cash-method taxpayers and is not limited to accrual-method taxpayers. I.R.C. sec. 468(a). Held, further, cash-method taxpayers must make an I.R.C. section 468 election to currently…

1Opinion of the Court

BOB GREGORY AND KAY GREGORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent;

JAMES W. GREGORY, JR. AND JANET E. GREGORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Gregory v. Comm'r

Docket Nos. 17198-13, 17210-13.1

United States Tax Court

2017 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 35; 149 T.C. No. 2;

July 11, 2017, Filed

Decisions will be entered for petitioners.

Ps own C, an S corporation that operates a landfill and uses the cash method of accounting for tax purposes. C is legally required to pay reclamation and closing costs if and when it closes the landfill. C currently deducted its…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API