Legal Opinion

Neves v. Potter

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1987No. 85CA1001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

The plaintiffs, Deanna M. and Manuel D. Neves II, individually and as guardians of and conservator for Manuel D. Neves III, appeal the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, Robert E. Potter, D.O., and Gilbert Roth, D.O. The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in ruling that a release signed in settlement of a claim against a hospital also operated to release the defendants. We affirm.

In 1974, Manuel D. Neves III, then 22-months old, entered Eisenhower Hospital in Colorado Springs for surgery on his right ear and for an adenoidectomy. The defendants were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. SweatAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Peters v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Bjork v. Chrysler Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Whitt v. HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API