Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aventura Management, LLC v. Spiaggia Ocean Condominium Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 2013No. 3D11-2545Published

1DissentShepherd, J.

I respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion presents a conundrum. It first concludes, correctly in my view, that Spiagga Ocean Condominium Association’s statutory lien, afforded by section 718.116(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), “survives the foreclosure.” Maj. Op. at 5; see also Lassiter v. Kaufman, 581 So.2d 147, 148 (Fla.1991); Contos v. Lipsky, 433 So.2d 1242, 1245-46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). It then invokes subsection (l)(a) of the same statute, stating that “the prior owner,” which it interprets to be the Association, “is jointly and severally liable with the current owner for all past due…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burnsed v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Goode v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  3. Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Contos v. LipskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Lassiter v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API