Legal Opinion

In re Permstick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1892No. 471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original Application for Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The petitioner is confined in the jail of Pierce county under a commitment of the superior court, which recites that in the case of The State v. Locke petitioner was the complaining witness; that the jury trying Locke had returned the following as their verdict, viz., “We, the jury in the above entitled cause, do find the defendant, George Locke, not guilty; and we further find that the complaining witness in the cause is Leonard Perm-stick, and that the complaint was malicious and without probable cause,” and that thereupon a judgment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LybargerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re RaffertyWashington Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miskimmins v. ShaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In re NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Town of Ilwaco v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API